<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://iraqmortality.org">
<channel>
 <title>Iraq Mortality - Media Analysis</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/taxonomy/term/19/9</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Counting the Iraqi Dead&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Recent polling (ABC/Washington Post poll, 3/16/05) indicates that the vast majority of the American public believes that U.S. casualties in Iraq are unacceptable. One can only wonder what Americans think about the level of Iraqi civilian casualties; unfortunately, the media&#039;s count dramatically minimizes that death toll.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2472&quot;&gt;Fairness &amp; Accuracy in Reporting&lt;/a&gt; Acition Alert, 21 March 2005&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It is odd that the logic of epidemiology embraced by the press every day regarding new drugs or health risks somehow changes when the mechanism of death is their armed forces.&quot; (Les Roberts, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;hr /&gt;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Media Alert: Paved With Good Intentions - Iraq Body Count - Part 1</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/media-alert-paved-with-good-intentions-iraq-body-count-part-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;MEDIA LENS: Correcting for the distorted vision of the corporate media&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;January 25, 2006&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the rare occasions when the issue of civilian casualties is discussed in the mainstream media three words are invariably mentioned: Iraq Body Count (IBC). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IBC describes itself as a project which maintains “the world’s only independent and comprehensive public database of media-reported civilian deaths in Iraq that have resulted from the 2003 military intervention by the USA and its allies”. (http://www.iraqbodycount.net/background.htm)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/studies/iraq-body-count">Iraq Body Count</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:07:24 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Burying The Lancet - Update</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/burying-the-lancet-update</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medialens.org&quot;&gt;MEDIA LENS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
September 12, 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In our Media Alert, &lt;a href=&quot;http://medialens.org/alerts/archive.php&quot;&gt;Burying The Lancet - Parts 1 And 2&lt;/a&gt; (September 5 and 6), we focused on the media response to a November 2004 report in The Lancet which estimated nearly 100,000 excess civilians deaths in Iraq since the March 2003 US-UK invasion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/media-alerts">Media Alerts</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:32:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Burying The Lancet - Part 2</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/burying-the-lancet-part-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medialens.org/alerts/05/050906_burying_the_lancet_part2.php&quot;&gt;MEDIA LENS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
September 6, 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We learn some ugly truths when we compare the media response to Les Roberts&#039; report on Iraq with the response to his earlier work in Congo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In our analysis we found that in both the US and the British press, news reports initially presented the estimates of 100,000 deaths in Iraq and 1.7 million deaths in Congo without critical comment. The difference lies in the days, weeks and months that followed. Whereas the Congo figures and methodology were accepted without challenge, the Iraq figures and methodology were subjected to steady, withering criticism by both politicians and journalists (with rare defences in comment pieces by, for example, Seumas Milne and Terry Jones in the Guardian).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/media-alerts">Media Alerts</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  6 Sep 2005 00:11:04 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Burying The Lancet - Part 1</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/burying-the-lancet-part-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medialens.org&quot;&gt;MEDIA LENS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
September 5, 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;An Exchange Between The Independent&#039;s Mary Dejevsky And Lancet Author Les Roberts&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&quot;It is odd that the logic of epidemiology embraced by the press every day regarding new drugs or health risks somehow changes when the mechanism of death is their armed forces.&quot; (Les Roberts, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/media-alerts">Media Alerts</category>
 <pubDate>Mon,  5 Sep 2005 03:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why U.S. Media Dismissed the Lancet Study of 100,000 Iraqi Civilian Dead</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/why-u-s-media-dismissed-the-lancet-study-of-100-000-iraqi-civilian-dead</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2005/01/why_us_media_di.html&quot;&gt;DIRELAND&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Doug Ireland&lt;br /&gt;
January 27, 2005 &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Chronicle of Higher Education&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; today has a top-drawer article about the researchers from Johns Hopkins and Columbia Universities  who published &lt;a href=&quot;http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2004/10/100000_iraqi_de.html&quot;&gt;the study in the British medical journal &lt;em&gt;The Lancet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; suggesting there were 100,000 Iraqi civilian dead from the war and the occupation. Lila Guterman, the article&#039;s author, notes that, &quot;On the eve of a contentious presidential election -- fought in part over U.S. policy on Iraq -- many American newspapers and television news programs ignored the study or buried reports about it far from the top headlines.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/articles">Articles</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:17:47 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Civilization versus Barbarism? : An Interview with Noam Chomsky</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/civilization-versus-barbarism-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lefthook.org/Interviews/AlamChomsky122304.html&quot;&gt;Left Hook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by M. Junaid Alam and Noam Chomsky&lt;br /&gt;
December 23, 2004&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On December 17th, Left Hook co-editor M. Junaid Alam met with Professor Noam Chomsky at his MIT office to get his thoughts on the ideological justifications and historical realities behind America&#039;s &quot;war on terror.&quot; Professor Chomsky spent a half-hour taking apart the framework of &quot;civilization&quot; versus &quot;barbarism,&quot; pointing to Western and particularly US state-sponsored atrocities, laying out the grave nature of war crimes committed in Iraq, attacking the intellectual culture which sanctions massive suffering, and explaining the elite&#039;s knowledge of the roots of terrorism.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;-Transcribed by M. Junaid Alam and slightly edited for clarification by Professor Chomsky&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/analysis">Analysis of Mortality Studies</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/interviews">Interviews</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/studies/the-lancet">The Lancet</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 03:04:26 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>100,000 Iraqi Civilian Deaths: Part II</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/100-000-iraqi-civilian-deaths-part-ii</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sourece: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medialens.org/alerts/04/041104_Iraqi_Civilian_Deaths_2.HTM&quot;&gt;Media Lens Alert&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
November 4, 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By way of a splendid coincidence, Media Lens received this delayed response from the BBC on November 3:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;I am writing in response to your email to Caroline Hawley dated 13/10. Apologies for the delay in replying. The estimate for the number of people killed by Saddam Hussein is based on the figure from Human Rights Watch.&amp;nbsp; They estimate that as many as 290,000 Iraqis were &#039;disappeared&#039; by the Iraqi government over the past two decades, and that many of these &#039;disappeared&#039; are those whose remains are now being unearthed in mass graves in Iraq.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/media-alerts">Media Alerts</category>
 <pubDate>Thu,  4 Nov 2004 02:55:51 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>100,000 Iraqi Civilian Deaths: Part I</title>
 <link>http://iraqmortality.org/100-000-iraqi-civilian-deaths-part-i</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medialens.org/alerts/04/041102_Iraqi_Civilian_Deaths_1.HTM&quot;&gt;Media Lens Alert&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
November 2, 2004&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Nicest Guys You Can Imagine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In their film, The Corporation, Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott and Joel Bakan describe how in the mid-1800s the corporation was declared a &quot;fictitious person&quot; in law and granted the same legal rights as real individuals. So what kind of &#039;person&#039; is a corporation? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The filmmakers assessed the corporate &#039;personality&#039; using diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organisation and standard diagnostic tools of psychiatrists and psychologists:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/media-analysis">Media Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://iraqmortality.org/sections/media-alerts">Media Alerts</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  2 Nov 2004 02:50:00 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
